Studierende im ZENTRUM

8. Literatur

  1. Entwicklung von studierenden-
    zentrierten Curricula
  2. Herkömmliche Curriculums-
    entwicklung vs studierenden-
    zentrierten Curriculum
  3. Auswahl der Inhalte und
    Setzen von Prioritäten
  4. Unterrichtsmethoden
  5. Evaluierung
  6. Unterstützung für Lehrende
  7. Vorteile eines studierenden-
    zentrierten Curriculums
  8. Literatur

Bartlett, L. and Butler, J. (1985), The Planned Curriculum and Being a Curriculum Planner in the Adult Migrant Education Program, Report to the Committee of Review of the Adult Migrant Education Program, Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Canberra, in: Nunan (1988), 181.

Feuerstein, R./Rand, Y./Hoffmann, M. (1980), Instrumental Enrichment. Glenview, Illinois, Scott Foresman.

Nunan, D. (1988), The Learner-Centred Curriculum, Cambridge, CUP.

O`Malley, M. and Chamot, A. (1990), Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge, CUP.

Oxford, R. (1990), Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know, New York, Newbury House.

Richards, J. C. (2001), Curriculum Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge, CUP.

Stenhouse, L. (1975), An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development, London.Stevick, E. (1989), Success with foreign languages: Seven who achieved it and what works for them, Hemel Hempstead, Prentice Hall.

Stevick, E. W. (1996), Memory, Meaning & Method. A View of Language Teaching (2nd edition), New York et al., Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Tyler, R. (1949), Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, New York.

Williams, M. and Burden, R. L. (1997), Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach, Cambridge, CUP.

Yalden, J. (1983), The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design & Implementation, Oxford et al., Pergamon Press

zurück nach oben