5.2.4 National Training Event / Budapest ECML Project B.1, ICCinTE,
April / June 2005 Teaching Language and Culture (Teacher Training Seminars) The National Training Event (NTE) in Budapest consisted of four seminars held by Ildikó Lázár, project coordinator (Hungary) and Ágnes Samu, local organizer (Hungary) from 2pm to 5pm on 27 April, 18 May, 1 and 8 June 2005. The venue was Kölcsey Ferenc Secondary School (1063 Budapest, Munkácsy
M. u. 26), which is a French-Hungarian bilingual school. The school has
a reputation of teaching 7 different languages (English, French, German,
Italian, Russian, Latin and Portuguese). The language of the workshop was Hungarian. Structure of the training event: Each session of the seminar consisted of an introduction to the theoretical background of the various aspects of Intercultural Communication training followed by several topic-centred activities and discussions based on the teachers' personal experience as well. Between the sessions the participants did short mini-projects as homework to develop culture-based exercises in order to upgrade the textbooks they use. Session 1 Defining key terms (culture, acculturation, intercultural competence,
etc.) Session 2 How to break stereotypes and encourage non-judgmental attitudes Session 3 Methods to help develop intercultural competence Session 4 The stages of acculturation The teachers have been given a large number of handouts which were used during the sessions and which they can modify and use in their teaching. They have also been given a bibliography of recommended theoretical and practical resource books and articles and a copy of each of the ECML publications of Mirrors and windows and Incorporating Intercultural Communicative Competence in Language Teacher Education as well as information brochures on the activities of the ECML.
Feedback The feedback was mostly positive, highlighting the awareness raising function of the discussions during the workshop and appreciating the large number of materials distributed to the participants. One critical remark concerned the relatively slow pace of the sessions. In addition, at the end of the training both the participants and the facilitators felt that it would have been better to hold the workshop on two consequtive days instead of four afternoons spread over three months. |