impel
  ELP implementation support
 
  Exchange of experiences, examples of good practice, support tools

 
Project
description


Context
|

Aims and Objectives |

Expected
Outcomes
|

Action Plan |


Team


Download project
description in
pdf format

Download project description in pdf format

Download project
flyer in
pdf format

Download project flyer in pdf format

   


CONTEXT

In October 2000 the Standing Conference of European Ministers of Education adopted a resolution recommending that the governments of member states, in harmony with their education policies, implement or create conditions favourable for the implementation and wide use of the ELP.

Development and implementation activities of various types have since been reported from 32 member states.

The numbers of learners so far equipped with an ELP can be estimated at some 700,000.

Six implementation projects with a target population of over 10,000 and nine with over 5,000 learners each are being conducted at present. There are plans to increase these numbers to eight and twelve respectively in the academic year 2003-2004 and to nearly double the number of learners involved.

Specific skills are needed to gain and maintain motivation and commitment of all those involved and to secure mid- and long-term support and finance, to maintain a process stretching over years, to monitor and evaluate impact, benefits, costs and to organise and disseminate feedback. The necessary professional skills go well beyond those traditionally associated with, and demanded from, project coordinators in the educational field.

Practical expertise and experience are being gained and are building up among leaders of implementation projects. A platform for leaders of implementation projects is needed:

  • to explore and develop concepts, strategies and feasible solutions;
  • to consider success criteria and to assess project outcomes.

The project team intends to report at regular intervals so that the progress of the work and the findings can feed into the overall work of the Council of Europe on the ELP, coordinated by the LPD. The final report will be drawn up in consultation with the LPD, submitted to the European Validation Committee and published jointly by the ECML and the LPD.
Exchange of information and coherence between this project and the project on "Training teacher trainers for the use of the ELP" will be facilitated by the fact that Dick Mijer (NL) is member of both project groups.


AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ______________________________

General aims

Gather and exchange information on experience in order to provide support for the day-to-day management of ELP implementation projects on an operational level.

Specific objectives

  • To gather and analyse information on experience and issues in day-to-day management of ELP implementation projects;
  • to elaborate sets of planning, monitoring and feedback tools;
  • to test and enrich the planning, monitoring and feedback tools;
  • to initiate a cascading process by making these tools available to project managers
  • to facilitate and support ELP implementation projects;
  • to disseminate information, expertise and experience in support of ongoing and future projects.


EXPECTED OUTCOMES ______________________________

  • A shared understanding of the complexity of the ELP implementation processes;
  • examples of well structured monitoring and feedback plans with proposals for success criteria;
  • sets of planning, monitoring and feedback tools via the LPD website and on CD-ROM available to people responsible for ongoing and future ELP implementation projects;
  • a core group of experienced experts able to advise the leaders of other ELP implementation projects;
  • a number of trained people carrying responsibilities or preparing to take on responsibilities for the planning, monitoring and reporting of regional (e.g. provinces, Kantone, Bundesländer), institutional (e.g. language institutes, universities) or eventually national implementation projects on an operational level. In addition to their educational background, these people carry out management tasks and are often involved in wide-range school development projects.


ACTION PLAN _____________________ ________________

2004
January to March
Preparation of the first meeting of the project team:

  • pilot version of an information grid in order to obtain structured information
  • the members of the project team test the information grid by presenting their own projects with the help of it

5-6 March
meeting
of the project team in order to

  • set the scene and the timeframe
  • discuss the grid and the information given by each member
  • agree on further information to be collected and pooled
  • discuss the collaborative working space
  • identify the extra experts to be invited in the following meeting.

The extra experts should be responsible for the planning, monitoring and reporting on major implementation projects (with important target population in several school sectors) on an operational level. They should be prepared to describe and document their project using the common reporting elements (ie grid) under development by the project team.

March to September
Preparation of the next meeting:

  • preparation of the concepts, plans and draft tools by the project team
  • testing of the collaborative working space
  • the extra experts prepare the information on their own project by using the information grid
  • compilation of the information by the co-ordinator and feedback to the project team

24-25 September
Meeting
of the project team plus 4 extra experts in order to:

  • Present and discuss the information given by the extra experts
  • Present and discuss concepts, plans and draft tools to be developed
  • Present and discuss elements that could/ should be provided by the LPD website in the end of the project
  • Encourage further co-operation with the project team

30 September-2 October
Progress report at the annual ELP seminar of the Language Policy Division.

October to December
Working on the concepts, plans and tools by the members of the project team.
Preparation of the web-platform.
Testing of the tools by the extra experts (the same as above). Feedback to the project team.

2005
25-26 February
Meeting
of the project team in order to:

  • analyse information collected, select information to be pooled
  • discuss drafts of planning, monitoring and feedback tools
  • discuss a structured monitoring and feedback plan
  • trial run of the web-based information platform and formalisation of the
    mechanism for on-going information collection and selection
  • planning further work.

March to August
Work on the concepts, plans and tools by the members of the project team.

9-10 September
Meeting
of the project team plus 4 extra experts in order to:

  • present the work in progress and discuss the challenges encountered so far
  • finalise the planning, monitoring and feedback tools
  • finalise a common monitoring and feedback plan
  • planning further work.

30 September
Progress report at the annual ELP seminar of the Language Policy Division.

October - December
Testing the common monitoring and feedback plan by the extra experts. Support by members of the project team.

2006

January - March
Testing the common monitoring and feedback plan by the extra experts. Support by members of the project team.

31 March – 1 April
Meeting of the project team plus 4 extra experts in order to:

  • present the work in progress and discuss the challenges encountered so far
  • feedback on the use of the planning, monitoring and feedback tools
  • adoption of the web-based information platform,

April - August
Using of the planning, monitoring and feedback tools. Collecting and compiling information related to implementation issues by the project team.

September/October
Progress report at the annual ELP seminar of the Language Policy Division.

6-7 October
Meeting of the project team in order to:

  • feedback on the on-going information collection and selection process,
  • feedback on the use of the planning, monitoring and feedback tools,
  • present and discuss of an outline final project report,
  • preparation of the central workshop.

October - December
Working on the final products and project report and preparation of central workshop by the project team.

2007

January to March
Working on the final products and project report.

29– 31 March
3-day ECML workshop

Overall workshop aims

The purpose of this workshop is to familiarise participants with various strategies for implementing the ELP within their own jurisdictions. The workshop will help partici-pants to establish a network of colleagues for ongoing dialogue after the workshop.

Specific workshop objectives

The participants will:

  • identify individual needs in relation to implementation
  • focus on key issues of implementation
  • examine examples of implementation, identifying elements of relevance to their own practice
  • reflect on their own experiences of implementation
  • develop an action plan taking account of their own circumstances
  • test the tools developed by IMPEL

Participants profile:

The participants carry (or are preparing to take on) responsibility for the planning, monitoring and/or reporting of ELP implementation projects on operational level.

The following persons would not be suitable for selection

    - those involved only at classroom level,
    - contact persons without direct involvement in the implementation process,
    - policy-makers/developers without direct involvement in the implementation process.

19-20 April
Meeting
of the project team to finalise

  • the planning, monitoring and feedback tools
  • the data for the web-site platform
  • the project report

Summer
Publication ofCD-Rom
and presentation for the web-site platform.

October
Presentation and discussion at the annual ELP seminar of the Language Policy Division.

 

LANGUAGES
The working languages of the project are English and French. Simultaneous interpretation will be provided for the central workshop only. The participants in group work may agree to use other languages, though interpretation will not be provided.
All reports and tools will be submitted in English or French. The project team will endeavour, as far as possible, also to collect and make available information and expertise reported in other languages than English and French.
The project team comprises native speakers of Dutch, English, German and Italian.